Red-Hot Resources

"Luck is not chance, it’s toil; fortune’s expensive smile is earned.”

Wednesday, December 12, 2007

56 Days to Empty?

The Bush administration's decision to add more oil to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve has added as much as 10 percent to the price of crude, an oil consultant told a Senate panel Tuesday.

The Bush administration has been adding 50,000 barrels a day to the emergency oil stockpile since August, with plans to kick up the pace to 70,000 barrels a day by the end of January.

The Strategic Petroleum Reserve now contains 695 million barrels of oil — enough to keep the U.S. economy running for 56 days if imports were cut off suddenly.

The federal government has been soaking up as much as 0.3 percent of the world's supply of light sweet crude at a time when crude is over $90 per barrel.

My question -- what does the Bush administration know that would make them so eager to add to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve when prices are so high? Is bombing Iran still on the table?

Labels: , , ,

Check out my new gold and energy blog at MoneyAndMarkets.com

Thursday, March 29, 2007

The Enemy of My Enemy Is My Friend ... Oh, CRAP!

If there's one thing we could count on in the ever-shifting sands of the Middle East, it's that the Bush family and the ruling House of Saud go back a long way. And many said the reason we stuck around Iraq so long is because the Saudis insisted we stick around to help balance out the Iranian influence (we could also count on the eternal emnity between the Sunni Saudis and Shiite Iranians).

Maybe not so much anymore. According to the Washington Post ...

President Bush enjoys hosting formal state dinners about as much as having a root canal. Or proposing tax increases. So his decision to schedule a mid-April White House gala for Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah signified the president's high regard for an Arab monarch who is also a Bush family friend.

Now the White House ponders what Abdullah's sudden and sparsely explained cancellation of the dinner signifies. Nothing good — especially for Condoleezza Rice's most important Middle East initiatives — is the clearest available answer.

So then, who is Abdullah hanging around with?

Abdullah gave a warm welcome to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in Riyadh in early March, not long after the Saudis pressured Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas into accepting a political accord that entrenches Hamas in an unwieldy coalition government with Abbas's Fatah movement.

And then we have the New York Times chiming in with this ...
RIYADH, Saudi Arabia — King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia told Arab leaders on Wednesday that the American occupation of Iraq is “illegal,” and he warned that unless Arab governments settle their differences, foreign powers like the United States would continue to dictate the region’s politics.
So the two biggest oil producers in the Middle East, who previously hated each other with the white-hot intensity of a summer desert sun, seem to be making up. I guess W can take credit for that much, if he wants to.

Now, let's look at an interesting chart of oil ...

Now do you see why I added energy stocks to Red-Hot Canadian Small-Caps and Red-Hot Resources yesterday? I'm not so much concerned about the Iran crisis-du-jour -- it could become something bigger, or it could be resolved overnight. It's the longer-term trends that have me concerned. I think we should play those longer-term trends.

Two other fundamental drivers to consider (ripped from the pages of yesterday's Red-Hot Canadian Small-Caps) ...

* Rising demand. According to an Energy Department report, gasoline demand keeps climbing, up about 2% from a year ago. Meanwhile, oil stockpiles dropped in the most recent report, and gasoline supplies fell for a seventh straight week. You need oil to make gasoline, and this is pressuring oil prices higher. Gasoline demand in the U.S. peaks between Memorial Day in late May and Labor Day in early September. We can expect upward pressure on oil prices during that time frame.

* Is a bad hurricane season brewing?
The North Atlantic hurricane season runs from June 1 to Nov. 30. But we’re seeing signs that the La Nina weather system -- which breeds more hurricanes in the Atlantic -- is forming. And Atlantic hurricanes can stomp their way into the Gulf of Mexico, which is packed with oil and natural gas platforms.

Indeed, hurricane activity may be as much as 75% above the historical average this year as warm water feeds storms, forecaster Tropical Storm Risk said on March 21.

An estimated 17 tropical storms may form, of which four will become major hurricanes with winds topping 111 miles per hour (179 kilometers per hour), the forecaster said.

Now, it’s impossible to accurately predict how many hurricanes we’ll have in a season. Last year, only one tropical storm came ashore. But in 2005 -- a La Nina year -- there were a record 27 storms, including Hurricane Katrina, which devastated New Orleans, much of the US Gulf Coast, AND “energy alley” in the Gulf of Mexico.

Labels: , , ,

Check out my new gold and energy blog at MoneyAndMarkets.com

Monday, January 15, 2007

Such Lovely People, MLK Day Edition

Iran, Venezuela plan anti-US fund

CARACAS: Venezuela's Hugo Chavez and Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad — fiery anti-American leaders whose moves to extend their influence have alarmed Washington — said on Saturday they would help finance investment projects in other countries seeking to thwart US domination.

XX Really, the best thing about our enemies is they manage money even worse than the Good-Time Charlies in Washington, D.C. We can only hope that every tin-pot dictator in the world takes Iran and Venezuela up on their offer and drives them that much closer to insolvency.

Labels: ,

Check out my new gold and energy blog at MoneyAndMarkets.com

Thursday, January 11, 2007

War With Iran?

A forecast for colder weather in the next couple weeks is getting the credit for a rise in oil prices I think there's something else afoot...

From the Associated Press:

Iraqi officials said Thursday that multinational forces detained as many as six Iranians in an overnight raid on Tehran's diplomatic mission in the northern city of Irbil....

The forces stormed the Iranian mission at about 3 a.m., detaining the five staffers and confiscating computers and documents, two senior local Kurdish officials said, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the information....

A resident living near the mission said the foreign force used stun bombs in the raid and brought down an Iranian flag that was on the roof of the two-story yellow house.

XX My take: President Bush sent US forces to attack a foreign diplomatic mission, the Iranian mission in northern Iraq. I’m not an international lawyer, but isn’t a foreign mission legally the land of a foreign nation? If so, for all intents and purposes, we just invaded Iran.

The Iranians are taking a dim view of it. From the article: Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesman Mohammad Ali Hosseini told state-run radio that the raid was "against a diplomatic mission" since the "presence of Iranian staffers in Irbil was legal."

Can you see how the Iranians might think that we took their diplomats "hostage" when our forces detained them? It's hard to see under international law how this is legal -- it would be best for the US standing in the international community if the Iranians are released soon. And it's truly ironic that we appear to have initiated the very action that we condemned Iran for in Jimmy Carter's presidency - attacking diplomatic missions in violation of international law.

As a side note, President Bush may have just given every country in the world justification for attacking US diplomats, attacking US diplomatic posts and embassies, and "detaining" our diplomats.

So what President Bush is up to? While I can’t read his mind, it appears he is trying to provoke a war with Iran, either by forcing Iran to strike back, or by discovering secret Iranian diplomatic documents that would prove their complicity in helping the insurgents in Iraq. We have three carrier groups either in the Persian Gulf or headed there now. Unfortunately, that small body of water makes them sitting ducks in a bathtub. Their anti-missile weapons are made to shoot down Exocet Missiles, not Iranian Sunburn missiles that fly at mach 2.5. And let's hope our ships have a defense against Iran's new, near-supersonic torpedoes.

You can read a recent article on Iran's "Asymmetrical Naval Warfare" by CLICKING HERE.

Bottom line: I thought oil was going to look for a bottom a little lower, but I can see why it is rebounding today. If this situation worsens – and it seems Bush is determined to use force, not diplomacy, with Iran – oil could go a lot higher in a hurry. And gold, too!

Labels: , ,

Check out my new gold and energy blog at MoneyAndMarkets.com