What I'm Watching Now ...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2aa3/a2aa307c0b729398901138044174c96aa4263832" alt=""
"Luck is not chance, it’s toil; fortune’s expensive smile is earned.”
I wrote a rather lengthy Money and Markets column for tomorrow. Here's one section that was cut out by my editor ...
A potential currency un-pegging is not the only problem with OPEC, nor even the most bullish for oil prices. The other problem is that the cartel is supposed to have spare production capacity of 2.3 million barrels per day, if you believe everything the Saudis and Kuwaitis tell you. It may be less than that … potentially a lot less.
In September, OPEC bowed to Saudi pressure and announced a production increase of 500,000 barrels a day, which takes effect Nov. 1. But the Wall Street Journal recently reported on a weekly report from Oil Movements, a British company that monitors oil-tanker traffic in an effort to get around the secrecy of major oil exporters such as Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. According to the report, OPEC shipments for the first 10 days of November appeared to be “well below the October equivalents.”
The Saudis and the Kuwaitis are the only OPEC members with any real spare capacity (and most of that is with the Saudis). You’d think with oil over $90 per barrel, they’d want to ship as much oil as possible, not less. And it sure doesn’t look like they’re gearing up for the new production quotas.
Is The Well Running Dry?
The bad news is that discovery of new fields peaked in 1965 and production has outpaced new discoveries every year since the mid 1980s. Production is falling hard in the North Sea, Mexico … and Saudi Arabia. While there is potential in Canada’s oil sands, it is longer-term and may not be nearly enough to make up the difference.
Now, the Saudis say they’re cutting back by choice. Sure, there are some who will tell you that the Saudis’ claims to “spare capacity” is just a sham to prop up the wobbly House of Saud. I’m not one of the people making those claims, because I don’t want you, dear readers, to start mailing me tin-foil hats.
And it’s true that while existing Saudi oil fields are depleting at an average rate of between 4% and 5% per year, down the road, the Saudis will be bringing new production online – big fields including Khursaniyah in the fourth quarter, Nuayyim and Shaybah next year and Khurais in 2009. Still, it’s something to think about.
Kuwait Takes The Plunge Into Heavy Oil
And while you’re at it, think about Kuwait.
Kuwait is known for the medium- to light-crude it pumps from its giant Burgan oil field. But two weeks ago, Kuwait announced plans to start production of heavy oil to meet its 2020 target of producing 4 million bpd.
Producing heavy oil is very different from light or medium oil. But Kuwait might be running out of options.
We already know that Burgan has peaked. In November 2005, Farouk Al Zanki, Chairman of state-owned Kuwait Oil, reported that the Burgan oil field production levels are running down. Burgan will now produce 1.7 million bpd for the rest of its 30 to 40 years, rather than previous estimates of 2 million bpd. In total, Kuwait currently producing around 2.6 million bpd, down from almost 3 million bpd in 1972.
And then there’s Kuwait’s reserves, which are reportedly depleting at over 5% per year. Last year, Petroleum Intelligence Weekly reported that Kuwait's oil reserves were about half what was officially reported, or 48 billion barrels, based on internal leaked reports. Kuwait denies the reports, but won’t disclose the size of its reserves for “national security reasons.”
If the Saudis and Kuwaitis can’t supply more oil, who can? Well, production is ramping up in Russia and some other suppliers. OPEC forecasts non-OPEC supply of oil (all liquids) to increase from 49.85 million bpd in the third quarter of 2007 to 52.12 million barrels per day in by the fourth quarter of next year.
In my opinion, that is unlikely to happen. Here are just SOME of the geopolitical brushfires flaring up across the oil patch …
Now, all these troubles sound far away, and not a real problem for Americans. The problem is it hits you every time you fill up your gas tank. But the much bigger problems are right here at home …
US Problem #1: For Want of an Energy Policy …
Clarence Cazalot Jr., president and CEO of Marathon Oil Corp., recently made a plea for a comprehensive US energy policy. He said that as worldwide demand for fossil fuels rises, the country's biggest challenge is dealing with these and other related issues underlying U.S. "energy security." Other top CEOs have spoken out on the same issue – the US needs a comprehensive energy policy.
The White House did roll out a sort-of energy policy in 2001 – designed by Vice President Dick Cheney’s secret energy task force. Even before he revealed his energy policy, he said that “conservation may be a sign of personal virtue, but it is not a sufficient basis for a sound, comprehensive energy policy.” So, it’s not surprising that the White House plan was piece-meal and seemed more focused on handing out goodies to friends in high places rather than coming up with a comprehensive plan.
That’s a shame, because no country on Earth is more vulnerable to higher oil prices than the US. We import over half our oil. More importantly, the US uses 25 barrels of oil per person per year, compared to 12 in Western Europe, two in China and one in India. Of these 25, about nine are produced domestically and 16 imported.
Conservation led to increased efficiency after the 1979 oil shock, and that’s how Americans cut oil use 15% in six years while the economy grew 16%. I think it’s something we have to try and soon.
Energy conservation is also called “negawatts,” and it’s a fact that the cheapest energy in the world is energy you don’t use. If Americans want to see oil on the down side of $50 per barrel ever again, we might want to consider making energy conservation our next national project. If we keep using energy the way we are now, all the drilling in the world won’t save us.
US Problem #2: The Falling US Dollar
We at Weiss Research have been pounding the table about the weakening US dollar for quite some time, but the decline so far may be just a bump compared to the plunge around the corner. Saying that our elected windbags in Washington spend money like drunken sailors is an insult to drunken sailors. Runway consumer debt, credit inflation and the bursting real estate bubble are compounding the problem. And now, the US economy is slowing down even as the rest of the world bustles along.
The International Monetary Fund has targeted global economic growth at over 5%, led by powerhouses including India and China. Even Europe is expected to grow at about 2.5%. But in its latest World Economic Outlook, the IMF put the US’ 2007 economic growth rate at 1.9%, and said 2008 would see the same sluggish growth.
It’s pretty bad when “old man” Europe is outpacing you. In practical terms, this means international investors are more likely to steer their funds away from the US toward other countries. And that will send oil prices higher, because oil has a negative correlation to the US dollar of over 80%.
We’re already seeing this effect on oil and the dollar. And if OPEC does move to pricing oil in a basket of currencies, as I talked about earlier, that could turn the dollar’s slide into a free-fall.
Could anything drive the price of oil lower? Well, if the US dollar bounces, that would help. Or if the US economy goes into recession, that might lower oil demand around the world enough to send prices lower. But don’t count on that for two reasons …
#1) A recession in the US would send the value of the US dollar lower as well
#2) During the first eight months of the year, China's net imports of crude oil rose 18.1% over the same period last year. In other words, if we don’t buy the oil, someone else will.
There are many other things that could affect the price of oil – a clash on the Turkey-Iraqi border, a sudden spurt in supply or more storms in the Gulf of Mexico to name three. We should see corrections to the big trend. But the big trend should remain oil prices up and the US dollar down, so those corrections should be bought.
Labels: crude oil
"The need to establish a basket of currencies ... will probably be a point of discussion in the next OPEC summit," Ramirez told reporters during an evening event in the presidential palace.
"The dollar as a benchmark currency has been weakening quite a lot and it creates distortions in oil markets."
Read the rest by CLICKING HERE.This chart comes from OPEC’s Monthly Oil Market Report for October 2007, and shows how crude oil prices tapered off in September of 2005 and 2006 (the green and black lines) along with seasonal demand. Not this year. The red line shows that global demand this September was strong and getting stronger . As the report says: “In recent years, oil prices have tended to ease with the end of the driving season and the start of the autumn refinery maintenance. This year, however, prices have exhibited unusual strength and high volatility even beyond the end of the driving season.”
The OPEC report goes on to say: “Over the last few years, product markets experienced a sharp downward correction in September, adversely affecting the entire petroleum complex. However, this trend has been significantly diminished this year … With the approaching winter season, the momentum of the product markets may improve further, providing support for refinery economics and crude prices. However, the major wild cards continue to be weather conditions, particularly in
In other words, OPEC says prices are strong and getting stronger. That sure sounds like a recipe for triple-digit oil to me.
``I heard a utility participated'' in the transaction, Borschoff said. ``It wasn't just some hedge fund.''
Is there any good news in the world? Well, if, like me, you're from New England, there is THIS and THIS. But I live in Florida, so Sunday's victory by the Patriots was a bittersweet one for me.Labels: Red-Hot Canadian Small-Caps
Labels: ethanol
The September consumer price index numbers are in, and while we can argue whether they really effectively measure inflation, the numbers do move the market. The Cliff’s Notes version: Inflation is heating up.
The September headline CPI number was up 0.3%, compared to a 0.1% decline in August. A lot of people watch the energy component of the headline CPI. Well, the index for energy, which declined in each of the preceding three months, rose 0.3% in September – remember, it declined in June, July and August.
The big mover in September wasn’t energy – it was food. Food and beverages climbed 4.4% in September. The food index rose at a 5.7% seasonally adjusted annual rate (
I wrote about food inflation in a MoneyandMarkets.com column that was published today. You can find it here: http://moneyandmarkets.com/Issues.aspx?NewsletterEntryId=1106
Food and energy are excluded from core CPI, making it effectively useless. Still, for those keeping track, September core CPI rose 0.2%. Rents came down a bit, clothing was up a bit. If you’re not measuring food and energy, it’s easy to get a low number.
Year over year, the headline CPI number was up 2.8%, and core was up 2.1%. Year-to-date, inflation is running at a 3.6% rate. Compare that to a 2.5% rate for all of 2006. Again, energy is leading the way – up 11.7% so far, year to date, compared with 2.9% in all of 2006.
I believe that inflation is going to heat up going forward, led by energy and food. Keep your eye on food. As I say in my MoneyandMarkets.com column, American consumers now spend about 8.5% on food at home. That's way down from an average of 19% of the total budget in 1960. Historically, food takes up a much larger part of our budget, and I think it’s going to do that again.
Labels: economy
Labels: MoneyandMarkets.com
... snip ...
It looks like the price for uranium has bottomed and a “moderate and more orderly appreciation in price is about to begin,” according to Blackmont Capital analyst George Topping.
“Although we do not know the volume associated with the TradeTech price, we note that for the past 2 weeks we have seen stable prices, but with much higher volume,” he wrote in a note to clients.
So, I DID call the bottom on uranium in my October 3 MoneyandMarkets.com story, "A Distant Metal Thunder." Hoody-hoo! I was sweating that one, I don't mind telling you.Labels: uranium
Oil hit $88. It may have gone up too far, too fast, $92 is my line in the sand short-term, and I expect some consolidation before the next real run higher begins.
Gasoline should go higher due to supply squeeze, but it may follow oil if oil turns lower.
Gold hit $772 then reversed. (UPDATE: Now it's up again! Holy cow!) Looks technically poised for a pullback, but it really depends on what happens with the US dollar, which is managing a pathetic bounce.
TECH
So many investors saw tech as a refuge and piled in long after it became overpriced. Nasdaq is richly valued and bad news could burst the bubble of great expectations.
LM Ericsson's stock, which is listed on the Nasdaq, is getting hammered after the company softened its third quarter outlook "due to a shortfall in sales in mobile network upgrades and expansions which resulted in an unfavorable business mix.”
ValueClick shares tumbled Tuesday after the online-advertising firm lowered its outlook. This is a harbinger of doom for online and some tech stocks. Amazon and Overstock were both downgraded. IBM, Intel and Yahoo all report earnings after Tuesday's market close. I expect disappointment, though number-fudging can always come to the rescue.
Citigroup Inc., Bank of America Corp. and JPMorgan Chase & Co. are starting an $80 billion to help revive the asset-backed commercial paper market.
The new company will buy assets from structured investment vehicles (SIVs), units set up to purchase securities such as bank bonds and subprime mortgage debt. Problem is, The SIVs have about $320 billion in holdings, which is now, according to some accounts, so much worthless paper.
Wall Street breathed a sigh of relief in recent weeks when one big bank after another reported “all the bad news” in earnings. They thought that this kitchen-sink approach meant earnings could only go up in future quarters. Now it looks like it’s not only the kitchen sink, but the entire plumbing that is rotten.
I think the big financials think $80 billion will be getting off cheap. And that is a scary thought for anyone who is long the financials.
The news this morning isn’t good, either.
AGRICULTURE
Exports running way ahead of expectations. Droughts around the world are heating up foreign demand.
Sky-high wheat prices are grabbing the headlines, but keep your eye on corn. Demand for corn is rising. Corn usage will jump 5.3% to 763.7 million tons, the USDA said. Corn is used to make sweeteners and ethanol as well as animal feed. Farmers are substituting corn for sky-high wheat. The real growth in demand is overseas. US exporters just reported sales of 242,000 metric tonnes of corn to
This all puts a lot of money in farmers’ pockets, so they’ll be buying lots of fertilizer and seeds to plant from fence to fence. Equipment makers should have a bumper year.
Labels: agriculture
Labels: China
Copper Leads Advances on London Exchange as Dollar Weakens; Nickel Gains Copper snapped two days of declines, leading gains on the London Metal Exchange, with dollar weakness against the euro attracting buyers using other currencies. Nickel and lead also rose.
Gold Rises to a 27-Year High in London Trading, Platinum Jumps to a Record Precious metals extended gains, with platinum climbing to a record and gold rising to the highest since 1980 as a decline in the dollar spurred demand for alternative investments.
You don't see the paperwork. You won't see the panic. But behind doors in Palm Beach County and along the Treasure Coast, from the meanest fixer-upper to the glitziest gated community, thousands of homeowners are struggling to make the mortgage.
Between Jan. 1 and July 1, homeowners in Palm Beach, Martin and St. Lucie counties defaulted on 4,318 mortgages worth $1.05 billion. That's a 311 percent increase in defaults from the 1,051 recorded during the same period in 2006.
Loans in tony new communities crashed just as disastrously as homes in Counterpoint Estates, the aging middle-income subdivision just down the road from Versailles' golden gates. Condos that once generated traffic jams of eager buyers went dark.
Along some streets, next-door neighbors defaulted like dominoes: Waterway Cove in Wellington; Gazetta and Cresta Way in the Terracina subdivision in West Palm Beach; Strawberry Lakes Circle west of Lake Worth; Gull Road in Palm Beach Gardens.
Dry-as-dust court filings and bumper crops of rent-to-own yard signs merely hint at how deep the problems run. The $1.05 billion would buy the net assets of Florida Atlantic University — twice. And the number of soured mortgages adds up to one for every man, woman and child in Juno Beach.
Millions of dollars in mortgages collapsed before a single payment was made. Borrowers holding pre-construction loans defaulted on dirt before homes could come out of the ground.
The whole thing is worth reading. Point your browser to http://tinyurl.com/2o62ye
More good Sunday reading ...
1)A Universe Without Time? a paper by a group of astrophysicists in Spain has been making the rounds on the web since it suggests the Universe might be losing the dimension we call time. What we call existence, or as "Doc Brown" would call the Space-Time Continuum, is composed of 3 dimensions of space (X, Y and Z) and 1 dimension of time (T).
But what if the time dimension changed? What if the dimension of time became space-like?
2) If all this talk of Branes and alternate universes is over your head, you might want to check out the BBC's great introduction to string theory and parallel universes. What, you thought the universe ran on quantum mechanics? Dude, that is so 20th Century! Did you know, for example, that the latest (and highly regarded) theory posits that gravity does not originate in our universe, but "leaks in" from another universe? Freaky-deaky!Labels: agriculture
Many uranium stocks are rising off their lows, so it’s no big surprise that Paladin may be joining the party. The only news is that Paladin may be one of the potential buyers of Rio Tinto Group's Kintyre uranium deposit in